Answer:
a. Is the source credible? Is this source self-published (like a blog or Q/A forum), is there no author listed, does this organization publishing look like a credible source?
b. How old is this source? When was this source published. Does the topic of your paper require current source, or will older publications still be relevant?
d. Is the writing propaganda, opinion or fact? After reading the source, does the source appear to try and persuade you to one way or another, or does the source appear to state facts. When stating facts, does the source cite ITS sources properly?
Explanation:
brainly.com/question/12396961
Hope this helps.
Yes? to make it good every story needs humor
To illustrate how Van Lew continued to swap intelligence with prisoners<span>to emphasize Van Lew’s resourcefulness and determination
</span><span>to demonstrate the use of encrypted messages in the Civil War</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Do you mean
Why was Galileo reluctant to share his discoveries?
Since you put this in English, I will assume you wanted it answered.
The actual answer to the question is because he knew what the Catholic Church at the time thought about science and new discoveries that rocked their hold on intellectual thought. Only Newton, Freud and Darwin rocked it more.