Answer
Financial advantage from further processing $31
Explanation:
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost. </em>
<em>Also note that all cost incurred up to the split-off point (the cost of crushing) are irrelevant to the decision to process further . </em>
<em> $</em>
Sales revenue after the split off point( 64+64) 128
Sales revenue at the split-off point (16+47) <u> 63</u>
Additional sales revenue 65
Further processing cost ( 15+19) <u>(34
)</u>
<em>Net income after further processing 31</em>
Financial advantage from further processing $31
Answer:
$6250
$5000
$5250
Explanation:
Straight line depreciation expense = (Cost of asset - Salvage value) / useful life
($212,000 - $12,000) / 8 = $25,000
The machine was used for only 3 months in the fiscal year. Thus, the depreciation expense = $25,000 x (3/12) = $6250
Activity method based on output = (output produced that year / total output of the machine) x (Cost of asset - Salvage value)
(1000 / 40,000) x ($212,000 - $12,000) = $5000
Activity method based on hours worked = (hours worked that year / total hours of the machine) x (Cost of asset - Salvage value)
($212,000 - $12,000) x (525 / 20,0000) = $5250
Answer:
C. The second statement is correct
Distributive strategies focus on dividing the pie and integrative strategies on expanding the pie.
Explanation:
Distributive negotiation is a type of negotiation that both parties agrees to sharing existing resources within themselves so that they can part ways and it's mostly a win-lose situation while the integrative negotiation is a type where both parties seek to further expand the existing resources be looking forward to a collaborative process, it's always a win-win situation for both parties.
Answer:
One company pays 100%, the other re-reimburses 50%
Explanation:
If an environmental assessment found that the two companies share joint and several liability for a hazardous materials cleanup.
What could happen if the two of them don't agree to cooperate in the cleanup is that one of the companies will eventually settle the costs fully while the other party will have to reimburse the party that pays, 50%.
The paying company could make claims because the environmental impact assessment has already found both companies jointly liable. hence each company ought to jointly share the costs
Answer:
Option c. 5.25 times is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Below is the calculation:
Income before income tax = $420000
Income tax expenses = 120000 dollars
Net income = $300000
Interest expense = $80000
Interest earned ratio = Earning Before Interest and Taxes / Interest Expenses
Interest earned ratio = 420000 / 80000
Interest earned ratio = 5.25 times
Option c. 5.25 times is the correct answer.
