1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Margaret [11]
3 years ago
14

what happens to aggregate output if both taxes and government spending are lowered by $300 billion and mpc

Business
1 answer:
Papessa [141]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is:

1. consumers' expenditure increases by $150 billion

2. output will decrease by $600 billion

Explanation:

Tax impact:

$300 billion x 0.5

= $150 billion.

If taxes are lowered by $300 billion, consumers' expenditure increases by $150 billion because with lower tax, there is money money to be spent because their disposable income has increased.

Government spending impact:

$300/(1-0.5)

$300/0.5

=$600 billion.

Due to government spending that has increased by this amount, output will decrease by this amount too because government has directly competed with firms that should have used this money to increase the total output.

Therefore, net effect on total output is $300billion($600 - $300)

You might be interested in
Imagine that you own a property that is exactly 2.2 acres large. You want to sell your property, but your realtor tells you that
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

8,000 m²

Explanation:

you must first change the size of your lot from acres to square miles = 2.2 acres / 640 acres per square miles = 0.0034375 square miles

now we can convert to square kilometers = 0.0034375 miles x 2.56 square kilometers per square miles 0.0055 square kilometers

there are 1,000,000 m²´per km², so you have 0.0088 km² x 1,000,000 = 8,800 m²

7 0
3 years ago
Consider a portfolio comprised of four risky securities. Assume the economy has three states with varying probabilities of occur
olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

B. The portfolio expected rate of return must be the same for each economic state.

Explanation:

Variance formula = sum of (probability x (r - mean)^2)

r= expected return

if the expected return would be same for each economic state then the mean would equal to expected return which ultimately will give variance zero ( as r-mean would be 0).

Hence the correct option is B. The portfolio expected rate of return must be the same for each economic state.

8 0
3 years ago
Interest is defined as
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

in·ter·est

/ˈint(ə)rəst/

Learn to pronounce

See definitions in:

All

Commerce

Law

noun

1.

the state of wanting to know or learn about something or someone.

"she looked about her with interest"

Similar:

attentiveness

undivided attention

absorption

engrossment

heed

regard

notice

scrutiny

curiosity

inquisitiveness

enjoyment

delight

Opposite:

boredom

2.

money paid regularly at a particular rate for the use of money lent, or for delaying the repayment of a debt.

"the monthly rate of interest"

Similar:

dividends

profits

returns

a percentage

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A dry cleaner uses exponential smoothing to forecast equipment usage at its main plant. August usage was forecasted to be 50 per
katovenus [111]

Answer:

Explanation:

Forecast usage = 50 %

Actual Usage = 52%

smoothing constant = 0.10

⇒ 50 + 0.10 (52 - 50)

⇒ 50 + 0.10 (2)

⇒ 50 + 0.2 = 50.20

8 0
3 years ago
Lump-sum taxes are rarely used in the real world because:_______________
labwork [276]

Answer:

c. lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because they take the same amount of money from both poor and rich.

Explanation:

To understand this question, you have to first understand what lump-sum taxes are.

Lump-sum taxes are a system of taxes where everybody pays the same amount of tax no matter their economic status, or their actions. Basically, lump-sum taxes take the same amount of money from the rich and the poor, hugely increasing the burden on the poor and lessening that of the rich.

As an example, a lump-sum tax of $100 would require everybody to pay $100. To a person earning, say $120, that would be a huge hit, and be a huge burden on his normal life. However, to a rich person who earns, say, $10000, that would be much more easier for the rich person.

Hence, lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because of the unfair advantage the rich have over the poor in tax-paying.

Hope this helped!

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • On August 1, 2021, Turner Manufacturing lends cash and accepts a $24,000 note receivable that offers 4% interest and is due in n
    7·2 answers
  • The balance in the office supplies account on January 1 was $7,000, supplies purchased during January were $3,000, and the suppl
    15·1 answer
  • When a penalty is accepted with less than two minutes remaining in either half, the offended team will have the option to start
    10·1 answer
  • Cash paid for equipment would be reported on the statement of cash flows in_________.
    11·1 answer
  • Question 7 (10 points) A company received cash sales of $15000. They also collected $43000 in receivables during the month. Answ
    15·1 answer
  • Applying macroeconomic knowledge to explain the fiscal policy of countries in 2008
    14·1 answer
  • While writing a formula, what are some ways to insert a cell reference into the formula? Check all that apply
    12·2 answers
  • Which is considered a retail service?
    12·1 answer
  • A person making application, for themselves or another, to be insured under an insurance policy is called the:
    5·1 answer
  • accounting information is if similar items are treated the same way among various companies highlighting similarities and differ
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!