Answer:
I would say NA its better than saying nothing or not saying anything
Explanation:
The firm that would suffer the greatest decline in profits if sales volume declines by 15% is Mason Company.
The cost of a company is made up of fixed cost and variable cost. Fixed cost is the cost that does not vary with output of the company. It remains fixed no matter the level of output. An example of fixed cost is rent. Variable cost is the cost that varies with output. If output increases, variable cost increases and if output falls, output decreases.
If sales volume decreases, the output of Mason Company would decline more compared with the output of Kelley company because it has a higher fixed cost. So, we when sales reduces, its cost would would not reduce as many as the cost of Kelley company.
To learn more, please check: brainly.com/question/13059508
Answer: 1. a. The existence of a no-fault law.
2. d. $17,000
Explanation:
1. For Jane to prove that Famous was indeed negligent, she definitely does not need the No - Fault law. This is a law that is mostly applicable to motor vehicle accidents and means that the individual parties are responsible for whatever injuries they sustain and the person who actually caused the accident is irrelevant. The main aim of this is to reduce the damages claims that one can be put on Insurance which increase insurance premiums.
<em>If this law was to be applied here, Jane would</em> <em>be responsible for her own injuries and her suit would fail. </em>
2. Jane missed 2 weeks of work and in each week she earns $5,000.
She also had medical expenses of $4,000 and estimated pain and suffering of $3,000.
The general damages therefore are the two weeks she missed plus the medical expenses and the pain and suffering.
= 5,000 ( 2) + 4,000 + 3,000
= 10,000 + 7,000
= $17,000
Based on the correlational analysis of X and Y that is given, we can infer that there is a linear relationship between X and Y.
<h3>What does the correlation analysis show?</h3>
The Pearson correlation coefficient shows if there is a linear relationship between given variables.
In the given table, the Pearson Correlation coefficient is not 0 for either variable which means that a linear relationship does in fact exist between the variables.
Find out more on the Pearson correlation coefficient at brainly.com/question/24084533.
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
In the case of absorption costing, the fixed manufacturing overhead should be incurred at the time when the units are generated or produced. While on the other hand, in the case of variable costing the fixed manufacturing overhead should be incurred at the time when the units are sold
Therefore the given statement is true
Hence, the correct option is a.
