The question above, you want to assess your ability to interpret a text. For that reason, I can't write an answer for you, but I'll show you how to write one.
First, you must read the poem the question refers to. With this reading, it will be possible for you to understand the elements that your question requires you to identify.
These elements can be identified as follows:
- The theme of the poem refers to the message the poem wants to convey.
- The poem has rhymes, show how they add musicality to the poem and how important this is to bring out parts of the message.
- The poem presents imagery, which is the stimulation of the reader's five senses, through words that stimulate those senses. Show how imagery is used and its impact on the poem.
- The poem presents metaphors, which are implicit comparisons, which increase the meaning of the elements. Show where these metaphors are, their meaning, and their importance to the poem.
- Introduce the historical context of the poem by researching the author, his life, and the time when the poem was written. Show how significant all this was.
You can search for articles that analyze this poem and help you understand it.
More information:
brainly.com/question/21646250?referrer=searchResults
brainly.com/question/14188536?referrer=searchResults
committed crimes while the victim has been away from the victim's own home.
__________________________________________________________
o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0
A)The internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear.
D)It is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.
These both support Hannah's claim about allowing free speech on the internet so that protection does not turn into censorship. Option A supports the idea that the internet is a place where people can speak their minds. Option D explains why giving people the task of judging online content is problematic. The other two options are in favor of allowing certain safeguards that would limit free speech on the internet. These are counterclaims that Hannah needs to address in her argument but to show why they are weak not as support for her claim.
