You should go with answer three because !y class is also working on the history of China.
In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
Most likely because in poor, rural areas, public schools are scarce/ not easily available, and so sending a girl to school is not as prioritized as sending a boy to school, since a boy can start working and be a "breadwinner" for the family sooner than a girl.
Answer:
What war? If WWll than germany
Explanation:
The 10 commandments were told to Moses by god. Moses wrote down the commandments in Exodus 20.
