Answer:
People who study codes
Explanation:
The sentence that gave it away is If there were no cribs to be found, the British would send out false information about, say, British mines planted in a given area. The Germans might then send messages with the name of that area, which would provide clues about deciphering that code.
Hope this helps
The literary element that is most evident in the intentions of Brutus and Cassius regarding Antony is:
<h3>What is foreshadowing?</h3>
Foreshadowing refers to a way of looking into the future and telling the actions that a person will likely perform. In the discussion of the two men stated in this text, we can see that they thought about what will likely happen to Antony if they attacked Ceasar.
In that way, their speech can be regarded as a foreshadowing. Foreshadowing is a literary method that provides hints about things that will happen in the future.
Learn more about foreshadowing here:
brainly.com/question/96170
#SPJ1
Answer:
Swift says that it is common to see impoverished people in the street of Ireland.
Explanation:got it right on edge2020
Answer:
A warrior <u>frightens</u> a gruesome monster <u>away.</u>
Explanation:
When you complete a sentence you have to make sure that the combination o verb and predicate are compatible, and that they express in the best possible way what you are trying to say. So let's analyze the answers:
1) frightens; away: this is grammatically correct, and both words combine well and add meaning to the message.
2) splits; in half: this is grammatically incorrect, it would have to be "into halves" or "in two"
3) kills; forever: kills already implies is forever, it is repetitive
4)beats; in pieces: beats doesn't imply that the monster was split into pieces, so these two words don't combine.
