They located in an area that traders could reach in a single season.
Narrowing down choices until one arrives at only two options is an example of "<em><u>ideological polarization</u></em>
<em><u>ideological polarizationbipartisanship."</u></em>
<em><u>Ideological polarization bipartisanship</u></em> is a type of ideology in which individuals have various divergent beliefs on ideological issues.
However, to pick the right or favorable options, one narrowed these several divergent beliefs to two options and their find compromise.
The electorates usually use the ideological polarization bipartisanship to choose the candidates to vote for.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "<em><u>ideological polarization bipartisanship."</u></em>
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24874035
Confederation was chosen by congress because they the felt the need for a strong union and a government powerful enough to defeat Great Britain.
The correct matching are as follow:
1. HEARING: Listen to various experts about the bill, both supporters and opponents of the bill.
2. OVERRIDE: Two-thirds majority vote needed.
3.FLOOR ACTION: Activity concerning a bill which may include debates and compromise.
4. IN SESSION: The time when congress is active and members are present, fulfilling their respective duties.
Answer: A. The Supreme Court ruled that agencies enforcing the act were
defining "disability" too broadly.
Explanation: During the 1980’s, it became clear to the disability community that it should play a very active role in Supreme Court litigation under Section 504. The first Section 504 case which was decided by the Supreme Court in 1979, Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S.397, revealed at best, a lack of understanding, and also a hostility toward even applying the concept of discrimination to exclusion based on disability. In that case, a hearing impaired women was seeking admission to the nursing program of Southeastern Community College. The court found that Ms. Davis’s hearing impairment disqualified her to participate in the program because she would not be able to fulfill all of the clinical requirements. However, the Court did not limit itself to the fate of Ms. Davis, but included within the decision several very broad negative interpretations of Section 504.
