1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
3 years ago
12

Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had no power to make states enforce laws. Why was this a problem? The Congress cou

ld take over the state governments. The states could not work closely with Congress. It took away the importance of laws passed by Congress. It made the state governments unable to pass new laws.
History
1 answer:
Dennis_Churaev [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I would say C. It took away the importance of laws passed by Congress.

Explanation:

Since under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had no power to make states enforce laws. They had no way to make the states obey as they made the Articles of Confederation very weak in order to make sure there was no "taxation without representation" again. Congress had no power to tax the states or regulate commerce. Basically if Congress tried to pass a law it meant pretty much nothing and the states wouldn't have to obey to it if they didn't want to, which means it took away the importance from the laws they passed.

You might be interested in
King james i referring to
kotegsom [21]
NVA superstar LeBron James
4 0
3 years ago
Why does Henry think war with England is a necessary evil? PLEASE HELP
Gwar [14]

Answer:

because it was the only way to gain freedom because of englands taxes and their refusal of treaties

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
According to the law of demand, what increases the demand in the marketplace?
Crazy boy [7]
New items and new things and things that people want
8 0
2 years ago
Question 7
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

They celebrate the liturgy, soooo I think B (sacraments)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who Really Shot JFK?
dangina [55]

Lee Harvey Oswald was responsible for killing/shooting John F. Kennedy.

He went to Texas to raise more Democratic Party presidential campaign funds, wanted to begin his little 'quest' for reelection, and because the Kennedy-Johnson ticket just barely won Texas.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did people from scandinavia happen to settle in the northern plains?
    15·1 answer
  • The densest region of american population west of the appalachian mountains was adjacent to which river?
    14·1 answer
  • How many people died in the attack of 911?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement best defines an entrepreneur?
    15·2 answers
  • Can someone answers these quickly I have a soccer game today and I want to finish this :(
    6·1 answer
  • What are some of the benefits of world trade agreements check all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • Which advantages did Britain have against America during the American war for independence​
    13·1 answer
  • What can you infer was behind Nixon's decision to "freeze” wages and prices? Workers would be willing to be paid less if it woul
    10·1 answer
  • Which president took an active role in pushing the powers of the President?
    5·1 answer
  • Wight 536 in expanded form
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!