I would answer with C. because it is stating that students should have a more low-carb high-vegetable base meal plan in school lunches. This fits the negative tone of the sentence and agrees with it, so this would be the answer.
A. could technically be correct, but it does not flow with the tone of the sentence, as it has a negative connotation
B. Doesn’t have anything to do with the topic sentence, obviously elimination.
D. also doesn’t have anything to do with the topic sentence. Wrong because there is nothing mentioned about meat or organic foods.
Answer:
I think he´s (partly) right
Explanation:
Partly right because yes, colleges are flooded with individuals who seem to be out of place and not learning anything that they could have learned outside the school building. Murray´s essay follows quite clearly the opinion of Noam Chomsky. The strategical creation of a separated American class system is a daring theory that needs some (personal) coments because of its elitist element, i.e. we who study have (keep) the power.
Two examples:
México is a democracy in name where the powerful and rich people send their kids - no matter how stupid they are - to college schools and private universities that only exist as the entry door to a well-paid job. And even if you don´t go to university you can always buy your degree, as former president Fox did.
Germany is a real democracy that has a social education system. It is costly but the economic support (bafug in German) for students is based on how much your parents earn. If your parents are poor you get more money per month to study and vice versa.
Now kindly look at the American educational system and see if it resembles more the Mexican or the German system.
The show what the following section will be about so you can go into it knowing what you are reading.
