Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
Explanation: When actions are not immoral i.e they followed the standard guidelines governing the society, the resultant effects of such action if not desired or not intended can be morally tolerable but if the actions were immoral then the unintended or undesirable effects will also not be morally tolerable or accepted. Although undesirable effects are not means to a desirable consequences.
The war exclusion clause in an insurance policy clause that specially
omits coverage for acts of war such as incursion, insurgency, revolt or
military coup. It provides protection for an insurer who will not be obligated
to pay for losses incurred under such circumstances
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "Bureau of Consumer Protection." The group that evaluates the effectiveness of the FTC by studying and reporting on the market is the <span>Bureau of Consumer Protection</span>
