It's D. It lends a self-deprecating sense of humor that makes the narrator credible
Answer:
The similarity between the accounts presented in the primary source article "indicted her for murder" and the secondary source "midnight assassin" is that Both suggest that Mrs. Hossack may have had a possible motive for killing her husband.
Explanation:
The question is not complete since it does not provide the options to answer it, here are the options:
A:Both suggest that Mrs. Hossack’s attorneys do not actually believe in her innocence.
B:Both suggest that a nearby neighbor had a history of heated arguments with Mr. Hossack.
C:Both suggest that Mrs. Hossack may have had a possible motive for killing her husband.
D:Both suggest that the Hossack children had likely motives for killing Mr. Hossack.
The two references express the fact that Mrs, Hossack was in the house as Mr. Hossack was being struck over the head and killed, at his home a few miles out from Bedford. This makes her a principal suspect and connects both sources, both the article and the book focus on that point in common even when they are written in different ways.
<span>George Bernard Shaw said this
</span>
You play imvu i used to play lol sorry i just wanted to see ur profile pic but the think the answer is A. but dont get mad if im wrong. Have a great day!
He lieth in wait secretly as a lion in his den: he lieth in wait to catch the poor...
The verbal in this sentence is “to catch the poor” and it is an infinitive phrase that acts as an adverb of reason.
The walls, covered with ancient artwork, revealed much about the people’s culture.
The verbal in this sentence is “covered with ancient artwork” and it is a participle phrase that acts as an adjective that is modifying the noun “walls”.
