I honestly have no idea I’m just trying to ask a question
Although none of these are completely correct, I'd choose D. to change tenses, an irregular verb has to change its spelling.
A is definitely incorrect - that is a rule about regular, rather than irregular verbs. B is also incorrect - there are no rules about irregular verbs so you have to learn them all by heart. C is incorrect because this is true for regular verbs as well, not just irregular.
This leaves us with D as the correct answer. Often, various forms of irregular verbs change more or less drastically. For example: see - saw - seen; ring - rang - rung, etc.
Answer:
Aariannaa276 asked for help, <u>so</u> I agreed to help her. Luckily for her, I was available, <u>and</u> I wasn't busy with other things. It appears that she wasn't desperate for help, <u>for </u>she did not say 'pleeez,' or 'helllp,' or promise a Brainliest crown as reward. It really wouldn't make any difference anyway if she had since I never ask my Brainly students for money, <u>nor</u> would I accept it if they were to offer it. I've used five conjunctions so far, <u>yet</u> I still have two more to go. You know, I could've provided aariannaa276 with just some boring sentences as examples as she requested, <u>but</u> I decided to provide this cleverly written paragraph instead. She's either going to think I am clever guy, <u>or</u> she's going to roll her eyes at me.
Explanation:
As a narrator, Montresor can best be described as an unreliable narrator.
Explanation:
In most cases involving reading and/or literature, an unreliable narrator refers to a narrator who cannot be depended on or trusted. This is typically present in first person narration. In “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor is most viewed as an unreliable narrator because for one, he’s a character in the story he is narrating, which already deems his perspective to be likely to be untrue. Additionally, he has a set view of Fortunato that is biased. This is shown where he says that Fortunato wronged him, but the way that Fortunato wronged him is never explicitly mentioned in the story. To add to this, the plot of the story overall clearly displays Montresor’s manipulation. If you ask me, it seems he was the one who wronged Fortunato. The narrator also does not reveal everything about the past and what May have led him to say Fortunato wronged him. Because of this misconception, Montresor is seen as an unreliable narrator.
