Answer:
The statement is correct
see the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The equation of a exponential growth function is equal to
where
y is the area covered by the plant in percentage
x is the time in years since 2000
r is the rate of change
a is the initial value
In this problem we have
substitute the values
In the year 2005
substitute the value of x in the exponential function
48.6% is about 50%
therefore
The statement is correct
Answer:
Jake does have enough to buy a dog bone that cost $1.49
Step-by-step explanation:
6 quarters = $1.50
2 dimes = $0.20
1 nickel = $0.05
So add it all together: $1.50 + $0.20 + $0.05 = $1.75
Answer:
Since the calculated value of F = 1.4397 is less than the critical value of
F (9,9)= 2.4403 we conclude that the first instructor's variance is smaller and reject H0.
Step-by-step explanation:
1)Formulate the hypothesis that first variance is equal or greater than the second variance
H0: σ₁²≥σ₂² against the claim that the first instructor's variance is smaller
Ha: σ₁²< σ₂²
2) Test Statistic F= s₂²/s₁²
F= 84.8/ 58.9= 1.4397
3)Degrees of Freedom = n1-1= 10-1= 9 and n2 = 10-1= 9
4)Critical value at 10 % significance level= F(9,9)= 2.4403
5)Since the calculated value of F = 1.4397 is less than the critical value of
F (9,9)= 2.4403 we conclude that the first instructor's variance is smaller and reject H0.
Answer:
A) (56)^−2
Step-by-step explanation:
(22 + 34)^−2
Parentheses first
22+34= 56
56 ^-2
<span>the net income for the period to be understated.
</span>
