<span>Sanford B. Dole is the answer</span>
Answer:
Rousseau argued that the general will of the people could not be decided by elected representatives. He believed in a direct democracy in which everyone voted to express the general will and to make the laws of the land. Rousseau had in mind a democracy on a small scale, a city-state like his native Geneva.
political ideal combines the enthusiasm for civic virtue characteristic of ancient political thought with the moderns' insistence on the centrality of human freedom, calling for the establishment of a republic based on a social contract in which each citizen agrees with all the rest to be bound by the community's ...
Summary: Jean-Jacques Rousseau did not directly influence the Declaration of Independence; however, his writings on political theory and the social contract were influential to Thomas Jefferson and the drafting of the Declaration.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
If not let me know so i can correct
im sorry i dont really know how to summerize super good
I think the answer is B. philosopher
The Monroe Doctrine was A United States policy opposing European interference in America. This policy viewed any European effort to gain control back over the newly independent countries in America as "the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States." It was issued in 1823 under the presidency of James Monroe, in a moment that most Spain and Portugal colonies in AMerica were fighting for their independence or trying to build independent nations.
The original aim of this policy was to prevent the New World to become a battle field for the Old World powers, so the United States could exert its own influence undisturbed.
The Venezuela crisis was a perfect scenario to apply the Monroe Doctrine, because European powers were using military force to press an American country to pay its debt. This could have been seen as "an unfriendly disposition toward the United States". What Roosevelt did was add the Roosevelt corollary to the Doctrine, which asserted the right of the United States to intervene in Latin America in cases of "flagrant and chronic wrongdoing by a Latin American Nation" to preempt intervention by European creditors.
This changed the meaning of the Doctrine , which went from a policy of defending the American countries' independence to a policy that allowed the U.S. military interference in Latin America when it failed to pay European or U.S debtors from then on.