Answer
The colonies are no longer loyal to Britain's tyrannical rule.
Explanation
The declaration of independence was a formal document that summarized the colonists motivation for seeking independence. The Declaration of Independence establishes the values of the United States of America. It says that "all men are created equal" and have the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The conclusion of the Declaration of Independence described that the colonies are no longer loyal to Britain's tyrannical rule. By issuing the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress . American colonies severed their political connections to Great Britain. The Declaration summarized the colonists' motivations for seeking independence.
C to overthrow the government and establish a new one.
Answer:
The powerful people won the election.
Explanation:
Tactics such as donating money to political campaigns may be considered a drawback because due to this money the powerful people won the election instead of competent people which cost the country a lot. If there is no money used for political campaigns so the more competent person won the election that leads to increase in the prosperity and development of the country and its people.
Answer: The 89th Congress (1965–1967) passed a huge burst of domestic legislation that protected voting rights, promoted education, cared for the elderly, helped clean up the water and the air, promoted the arts and humanities, advanced automobile and highway safety, and extended a helping hand to the economically.
Explanation:
we do now. There will be many more requests for unanimous consent; like- wise there will be many more objections by individual Senators, for there will ... The Congress defined that role in the. Employment Act of 1946.
Answer:
Explanation:
Rwandans take history seriously. Hutu who killed Tutsi did so for many reasons, but beneath the individual motivations lay a common fear rooted in firmly held but mistaken ideas of the Rwandan past. Organizers of the genocide, who had themselves grown up with these distortions of history, skillfully exploited misconceptions about who the Tutsi were, where they had come from, and what they had done in the past. From these elements, they fueled the fear and hatred that made genocide imaginable. Abroad, the policy-makers who decided what to do—or not do—about the genocide and the journalists who reported on it often worked from ideas that were wrong and out-dated. To understand how some Rwandans could carry out a genocide and how the rest of the world could turn away from it, we must begin with history
