Answer:
I can only answer the first one
Explanation:
1.How did the colonists manage to triumph in their battle for independence despite Great Britain’s military might?
The colonists may not have had Great Britain's military might, but they made some smart, strategic decisions during the conflict that took advantage of the fact that British soldiers isolated themselves geographically.
hope this helped :)
Absolutely! Especially for example during the Vietnam war you had navy aircraft carriers off the coast providing troops and material that instead of being dropped by large aircraft could simply be carried by helicopters, notably the Chinook and Huey were the most vital
Spanish colonial forces had difficulty disarming the native people and this led to a less populated Texas and a 'buffer' type state. Fierce opposition from its native people scared many immigrants away, fighting was documented between Spain and the Comanche from 1519 to a peace accord finally in 1785. The term ‘buffer state’ was penned to explain the space and division in-between Colonial Spain (Mexico) and the French colonial Louisiana and the territory of ‘New France’.
Hamilton was seen as a person who favored more power obtained by the central government. This means he was in favor of things like a national bank, less state rights, and less of an ability for freed slaves to vote (because federalists were also democrats). Jefferson, on the contrary, was an anti-federalist. He feared that excess central power would infringe on the rights of the states, and so to avoid this, he did as much as he could to retain state rights. He also believed central government authority gave more power to the upper class (wealthy whites) than it did to the common man (poor whites, freed slaves).