1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Feliz [49]
3 years ago
10

Read the information below: During the 1820s and 1830s, many people settled in Texas and California. The territories were part o

f Mexico. Some thought that the United States should annex those territories. The territories were soon independent of Mexico. They became part of the United States. Which of following supports this passage?
History
2 answers:
Kobotan [32]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:  <u><em>C</em></u>   Texas and California needed U.S. military aid to gain independence from Mexico.

mixer [17]3 years ago
3 0
What supports this passage is that Texas and California were under control by Mexico until the land was fought for. That is why America couldn't annex it.
You might be interested in
What was a role of women in the Civil War?
stiks02 [169]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Was Columbus an explorer or conquistador
krek1111 [17]

Answer: He was an explorer

Explanation: Christopher Columbus was an Italian explorer who was commissioned by the monarchs of Spain to find a new route to India.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain one way in which alliances contributed to World War II.​
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

Sure.

Explanation:

After the invasion of Poland, the establishment of <em>alliances contributed</em> to the outbreak of World War II since it led to France and Britain declaring war on Germany.

7 0
3 years ago
why do you think the Sherman Antitrust Act and other attempts at regulating monopolies and trusts were not effective?
Vesna [10]
For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. When it was first passed, the Sherman Antitrust Act was largely ineffective at stopping industrial monopolies. Courts at the time tended to hold a very narrow view of what constituted “trade or commerce among states,” and most companies were not held liable under the act. For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Antitrust Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully. Ironically, its only effective use for a number of years was against labor unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations.
6 0
3 years ago
According to the fossil record, when did anatomically recognizable humans appear on Earth?
S_A_V [24]
About 200,000 years ago.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Enabling Act of 1906 called for the Oklahoma and Indian territories to divide into _____ districts and elect two delegates f
    15·1 answer
  • Approximately how many soldiers were killed during the great war ​
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me I'm stuck
    15·2 answers
  • Pick 2 of the events that you believe did the most to create conflict between the North and the South. Write an essay in which y
    9·1 answer
  • Which tax is an indirect tax?
    7·1 answer
  • Which Empire lasted only 100 years and which lasted 300 years
    15·1 answer
  • The executive branch of the government is responsible for interpreting laws true or false
    5·1 answer
  • Why was literature important in the 1920s
    9·2 answers
  • The deliberate tending of crops and livestock in order to produce food and fiber is
    14·2 answers
  • PLS HURRY I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!