Answer:
A. $450
Explanation:
In 2014, the Medicare surtax for high-income taxpayers started when married couples filing jointly earned over $250,000. in this case, Christine and Doug made $300,000, so the surtax = ($300,000 - $250,000) x 0.9% = $450
The Medicare surtax income threshold has not been adjusted to inflation and remains at the same level for 2020.
Total medicare contributions for high income taxpayers = 1.45% + 0.9% = 2.35%
Explanation:
The cumulative increase in your portfolio for a 25 years is
4% annually * 25 years = 100% — if you received a basic profit (without composition).
The cash would then double.
Your capital would multiply more rapidly than it does with simple interest with compounding interest and would thus take less than 25 years to double.
Answer:
In employment law, a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) (US) or bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) (Canada) or genuine occupational qualification (GOQ) (UK) is a quality or an attribute that employers are allowed to consider when making decisions on the hiring and retention of employees—a quality that when considered in other contexts would constitute discrimination and thus be in violation of civil rights employment law. Such qualifications must be listed in the employment offering.[citation needed]
Explanation:
Canada
The law of Canada regarding bona fide occupational requirements was considered in a 1985 Canadian court case involving an employee of the Canadian National Railway, K. S. Bhinder, a Sikh whose religion required that he wear a turban, lost his challenge of the CNR policy that required him to wear a hard hat.[1] In 1990, in deciding another case, the Supreme Court of Canada amended the Bhinder decision: "An employer that has not adopted a policy with respect to accommodation and cannot otherwise satisfy the trier of fact that individual accommodation would result in undue hardship will be required to justify his conduct with respect to the individual complainant. Even then the employer can invoke the BFOQ defence."[2]
United States
In employment discrimination law in the United States, both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act contain a BFOQ defense. The BFOQ provision of Title VII provides that:
[I]t shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise ...[3]
i'm not able to add the balance of the answer so pls go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_fide_occupational_qualification
A Quality Audit is a structured review of specific quality management activities that help identify lessons learned that could improve performance on current or future projects.
<h3>What is an Audit?</h3>
An audit is the physical and thorough inspection of an organization's account or activities carried out by an independent body.
In a Quality management system, a Quality audit must be carried out. The quality audit is a structured review regarding the quality management activities that helps in improving performance of the organization.
Learn more about Audit here:
brainly.com/question/26048609
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Based on this scenario, it can be said that yes the attorney's actions are proper because the referral fee was reasonable. A standard referral fee percentage could be around 10% for a closed job, starting at around 2-5% for e-mail introductions and even up to 15-20% for referrals where the referrer deals alone with the client. As long as the referral fee is reasonable and the attorney is not taking advantage then his/her actions are proper and ethical.
