Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
Answer:
C. $200 net loss
Explanation:
The net loss or gain is calculated on hedging to determine whether the hedge has been beneficial for the company or not. Hedging is a process to transfer exchange rate movement risk. This is usually suitable for the companies who have receipts or payments in foreign currencies.
The hedging gain loss can be calculated as:
Forward rate at the time of contract - spot rate today
$1.21 - 1.232 = 0.0232
Answer:
the correct answer to this question is the "Country Club Leadership Style". However, what you should remember is that you might come across different names for this such as "Laizes Faire Leadership", etc...
Explanation:
In this style of leadership, the main assumption is that wen the employee are happy, they will naturally work better for the company. However, lack of regulation and guidance may end up with a not-so-well disciplined work force and usually this style does not work with every type of employees.
Moreover, this style focuses more on creating a safe working environment with minimal conflict.
You just add it all together $150,000+ $20,000+ $9,000= your answer
Hope this helped! ;D
Answer:
$65,333
Explanation:
As we know,
Sales price = Variable cost + Contribution cost
Sales price = Variable cost ratio + Contribution margin ratio
100% = 30% + Contribution
Contribution = 100% - 30%
Contribution = 70%
Fixed cost = $19,600
Break even sales = Fixed cost / Contribution margin ratio
Break even sales = $19,600 / 30%
Break even sales = $19,600 / 0.3
Break even sales = $65,333.
