Answer:
well i dont actually know
Explanation:
i just do not know
Answer:
It occurred august 4th, 1735 in the colony of New York. This case is about the government who tried to silence a man because they didn’t like what he was saying. At the time the government was the king and there was no First Amendment. The jury found him not guilty because they saw this for what it was. This is a good example of the colonists believing the government should have limited power, and led directly to the First Amendment 40 years later
hope this helps!✌️
The Second Amendment is a fundamental provision of the Bill of rights. It protects the states right to maintain a militia, not an individual's right to possess a firearm. This ruling allowed states to restrict gun ownership and enabled them to pass laws in favour of certain religions, ban some forms of speech and outlaw some kinds of assembly. The Second Amendment in the US constitution confers an individuals right to possess a firearm for traditional lawful practices like self defence.
D.new theories reflected changes that were happening in society at large
