Answer: This can be explained as follows.
Explanation: A particular ratio can demonstrate the position of a company. For evaluating the position and position of a company the analyst should first compare the company with the industry average. The comparison with industry will imply whether company is in a surviving position or not.
Industry average may not give suitable results therefore comparison with core competitors should also be done.
A company having current ratio of 2.67 shows that such company have a sound financial condition as they have more than double of current ratios for paying their current liabilities .
Answer:
GDP is the value of the total production of final goods and services produced within a country (in this case Ireland), while Gross National Product (GNP), in this specific case, is the value of the total production of final goods and services produced by residents of the Ireland (individuals or businesses).
Since several corporations have international headquarters in Ireland due to special tax regimes, e.g. Apple, Microsoft, Google, Intel, Pfizer, FB, etc., and many of those corporations manage all their world trade (except local trade in the US) through those offices, they are very large and wealthy.
Answer:
Firm should operate.
Explanation:
Here, we are assuming that this is a situation of short run.
A firm will operate or shut down is totally dependent upon whether the firm will be able to cover its variable cost of not. If a firm will be able to cover all of its variable cost then this firm will not shut down and operates in the short run until it covers all of its variable costs.
In this case, given that,
Total revenue = $1,000
Total cost = $1,500
Variable cost = $500
Profits = Total revenue - Total cost
= $1,000 - $1,500
= -$500
Therefore, this clearly shows that this firm will be able to cover its variable cost of $500 with the total revenue of $1,000. That's why the firm remains in the market even there is a loss of $500.
Hence, this firm should operate.
Answer: No.
Explanation:
Even though Stoker obtained this information after terminating the agency with the buyer, he cannot share it with the seller as in this case, it seems that the full effect of the changed relationship isn't understood by the buyer-customer.
It's essential for the broker to make sure that certain the former client understands the meaning of the situation at hand.
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. <span>Theorists who emphasize the environment in explaining individual differences typically stress the importance of early experiences. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>