The answer is D. Partnerships are liable to boundless obligation, which implies that each of the partners shares the risk and budgetary dangers of the business. Which can be off-putting for a few people. This can be countered by the arrangement of a restricted obligation organization, which profits by the upsides of constrained risk allowed to restricted organizations, while as yet exploiting the adaptability of the association show.
Answer:
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
Positive technological change or variation occurs or happen when the business or the firm is able to produce or manufacture more amount of output by using the same amount of inputs or the same output which have the fewer inputs.
The example of positive technological change occurs when the firm or the business installs the faster machinery and makes the firm more profitable through increasing the revenue.
Answer:
D) Sue can sue Jerry and bring the case to Iowa federal court as this is a case that involves diversity of citizenship.
Explanation:
Diversity of citizenship means that the parties involved in a lawsuit are citizens of different states (within the US) or are citizens of different countries. If a company is involved in a lawsuit, its citizenship is defined as where the company was incorporated or where does it carry its normal business operations.
In this case since Sue is a citizen of the state of New York and Jerry is a citizen of the state of Iowa (diversity of citizenship applies), Sue can choose to sue Jerry in a federal court since the citizens of two different states are involved.
Neudjsbqjaisinfhsu sorry need points
Answer:
It is a relatively easy method to apply.
Explanation:
When accounting for a subsidiary, equity method is followed, whenever the shareholding percentage is equal or more than 20%.
But here, the parent company uses, initial value method for internal reporting.
Under initial value method the value of investment in subsidiary is recorded at cost, and then adjusted at year end at fair value, this clearly shows the gain or loss at each year end from such investment as per market norms.
There is no statutory requirement to follow such initial value method for internal reporting.
The correct reason therefore, is:
It is a relatively easy method to apply.
