Answer:
Case study
Explanation:
A case study is a kind of study used in social sciences in which the researcher observes an individual/group/event in a very in-depth manner. Case studies give a lot of information about the person or group who is being studied and let the researcher make causal inferences (because of the in-depth observation) and the researcher gets a better understanding of the situation.
In this question, the psychologist faces an ethical dilemma of needing to remove a potentially beneficial treatment. However, using a case study, she wouldn't need to do so because she could observe the autistic child in his environment without changing it, because the case study is an observing explanatory study. Therefore, the ethical dilemma would be eliminated and she could draw conclusions from the study.
Answer:
1) The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. 2) Basic legislation by Congress, actions taken by the President, key decisions of the Supreme Court, the activities of political parties, and custom.
Answer:
<h3>No, as a reader, I wasn't able to remain equally nonjudgmental as Jeanette.</h3>
Explanation:
I wasn't able to remain equally nonjudgmental as Jeanette because she was brought up in a family where she thinks that her parents had done much more for her than she deserves.
Jeanette refuses to condemn her parents because she is sentimentally connected to them so much. As a reader, I feel that her parents have failed to protect her from sexual predators as they thought that it was normal when in reality it was their duty to protect her from any potential threat.
Jeanette also feels that she should not confront her parents with her personal problems. However, it is rather the parents who have made it 'normal' for her to feel that some things are meant to just 'let it slip'. This is why I think her parents have failed in my perspective.
Answer:
Neanderthals and homosapiens had larger brains and a more developed culture.
Explanation:
Neanderthals and homosapiens had larger brains and a more developed culture.
Answer:
Option B and C
Explanation:
Federalism is a system of government whereby there is a controlling Authority over a system of government where by the possibility of a principles of a party is implemented generally.
It encourages economic equality and it has a sharing formulae that would benefit the whole system and it encourages different opinion so dar it would contribute to the development of the system . it doesn't encourages much political participation as it is not the reason why people engage in political activities and also it doesn't provide for multiple system of government. So options B and C are exemptions
