This is of course a very complicated issue and there are several reasons why this conflict been so difficult to resolve, but the main reason is that both sides are claiming territory that they have both legitimately held.
Answer: c. are dedicated to high standards of ethical behavior, see themselves as stewards of ethical behavior, and believe it is important to pursue success in business within the letter and spirit of what is ethical and legal.
Explanation:
The moral manager has a dedication towards ethical behavior in both his/her personal and work life. This manger aims to achieve business goals by following the highest ethical standards. To this manager, the end does not justify the means, the process is as important as achieving the goal and it must be just as ethical.
In contrast, the immoral manager is intentionally unethical, believing that business requires ruthless decisions. The amoral manager is similar to this kind of manager but may or may not be deliberate in his unethical business dealings.
<span>These opposing expectations are an example of "role strain".
</span>
In the day by day lives of individuals, a large portion of them attempt to align their part execution with their part desires. Now and again, be that as it may, this isn't simple and conceivable. A few people think that its hard to play out the part expected of them. This is alluded to by sociologists as part strain, the issues of people in meeting or satisfying their parts. Role strain alludes to in-congruence among the parts comparing to a solitary status.
