1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex777 [14]
4 years ago
9

Anti-Federalists argued that

History
1 answer:
kirill115 [55]4 years ago
4 0
Anti-Federalists argued that it was impossible to separate government into equal branches. So the answer is B. it was impossible to separate government into equal branches.
You might be interested in
Why was president george w. bush criticized during his second term? he passed the no child left behind act. his administration f
stealth61 [152]
B. admin failed to reform the health care system 
5 0
3 years ago
What was the major difference between the french and american revolution?
Alla [95]
The difference was that they ought more thing then they did
3 0
3 years ago
Vietnamization of the war was the U.S. policy that required: South Vietnamese troops to replace American troops Cambodia and Lao
Dmitriy789 [7]
Vietnamization of the war was the U.S. policy that required "South Vietnamese troops to replace American troops". The point of this was to ease frustration in the US that too many American soldiers were dying in a way many Americans felt was pointless. 
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act?
boyakko [2]

Answer:

A. To prevent companies from restraining trade.

Explanation:

The Sherman Antitrust Act was issued on July 2, 1890, by Senator John Sherman. The purpose of this act was keep all the free business competition, and made it illegal to control the commerce and/or trade.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does monarchy lead a more prosperous society?<br><br> Please help 2-3 sentences is fine:’(
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

The monarchy also stabilizes the state by encouraging slow and gradual change instead of extreme change in the nature of the regime. The monarchy of the Arab state has built a much more stable society than the non-military Arab state, many of which have undergone such seismic changes during the Arab Spring.

Explanation:

I think the first sentence would be good for the answer but I'm not sure about the second question. If it didn't help you I'm sorry. But definitely monarchy helps stabilizing the state by encouraging slow rather than extreme change in the nature.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the economy of China change during the Zhou Empire? A.China’s economy contracted as nomads from the north raided village
    14·2 answers
  • What year did construction begin on the Panama Canal
    11·2 answers
  • Arrange the events in twentieth-century Argentina in the correct chronological order. Tiles A military junta takes power and eng
    6·2 answers
  • Which president mentored President James K Polk?
    13·2 answers
  • One reason we need to stay informed is because we will be called upon to _______.
    10·2 answers
  • 4. What did the Romans use fasces for?
    15·2 answers
  • What are three branches of government found in early state constitutions? (5 points).
    7·2 answers
  • Hiiiiiii can you help me pleaaaaaaaase ?
    14·1 answer
  • According to the Bible, who is the "Last" Adam?​
    10·1 answer
  • Kirsten is reading a nonfiction text on biomes for a science project. She needs specific information about climate, rainfall, an
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!