For his own sake, no. What he did blatantly put himself in danger and finally was placed under interrogation, etc & so forth.
For the sake of science, yes. What he did, and the consequences thereof, would have publicised his struggle, especially during the age of Enlightenment. Although what he did might also have momentarily pushed people away from science in fear of the consequences of facing the church due to the harsh punishment that he was subjected to. His persistence was, in the end only healthy for the development of science in later years.
It was a bad decision on his part. Some may say his decision was good at the beginning but ultimately he made the choice to stay at war which led to a bad turn of events. Millions of dollars were spent on this and it wasn't even really successful, so I believe that was a poor decision.
C. rises; decreases
If the price of a substitute good rises, the demand for a good decreases.
Answer:
Explanation:
- War hero
- Related to the public (man of the people)
- Strongest personality (was popular and well liked because of this)
A life. And he can write on a scribe to explain the lice he has... If he didnt know how to write then he can think about how GREAT is life is
