Answer:
C. personal appeal
Explanation:
Helene was using a classic personal appeal tactic when pleading JP no to tell on her. She relied on friendship and a personal relationship between them, which is what personal appeal is all about.
It is one of the <u>influence tactics</u>. If this was a<em> pressure tactic</em>, Helene would probably threat JP, which she didn't do in the example.
If it was a <em>coalition tactic</em>, Helene would try to get JP to help her persuade someone else, which is a non-existent aspect here.
<em>Legitimating tactics</em>, on the other hand, base on the authority gained by an individual's organizational position or some established policies.
<em>Exchange tactics</em> always imply some returned favors.
I think the answer is D because I took math all my school years and I’m smart.
Answer:
D) $45,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount which is included in the current liability section is shown below:
= Account payable balance + bonds payable - discount on bonds payable + dividend payable
= $15,000 + $25,000 - $3,000 + $8,000
= $45,000
The current liability is that liability which is arise for one year. Since, the notes payable is a long term liabilities so we do not consider in the computation part.
Answer:
46.5%
Explanation:
The treasury bills have zero beta as they have no systematic risk. Beta is used in the Capital asset pricing Model to demonstrate a relationship between systematic risk and rate of return.
Expected Return = Rf + Beta * Rp
The percentage that should be invested in the risky portfolio will be,
1 - 1 / Beta
1 - 1 / 1.87
= 46.5%
I'm really not sure this is the right answer, but there are 20! ways to arrange 20 students in different orders. 20! is a VERY large number haha but that's how I'd do it :/
