1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amiraneli [1.4K]
3 years ago
11

Use the drop-down menus to complete the sentences.

History
2 answers:
e-lub [12.9K]3 years ago
7 0
This was a bit hard to understand but here we go.
1. The Americans with their population of 308,745,538 according to the census from 2010 make up only <u>5%</u> percent of the the total worlds population. Even though it makes up only about 5% of the world population the US is still the third largest country in the world in terms of population. 

2. Still even though the the population of the United States makes only 5% of the total world population they make up about <u>50%</u> of the "world's top 1%" So that means that 50% of the biggest earners in the world are the citizens of the United States of America. 

3.To further clarify this, it means that a <span>majority of Americans are in the <u>1%</u> of all earners in the world, which is defined as those earning more than $34,000 a year. This takes into consideration the average earnings of all the citizens of the world the 1% is classified as those who earn more than 34,000 dollars.
</span><span>
</span><span>
</span><span>4. This is thanks to the United States' commitment to what is called<u> a free enterprise.</u> Free enterprise is also called  a free market, which is an economic system in which there are few restrictions and as little as possible government meddling in which the rules of supply and demand rule.
</span>


dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

5%

50%

Top 1%

Free enterprise

Explanation:

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP FAST Why did President Lincoln oppose a compromise that would extend slavery into the west?
bija089 [108]

“In politics Mr Lincoln told the truth when he said he had ‘always hated slavery as much as any Abolitionist’ but I do not know that he deserved a great deal of credit for that for his hatred of oppression & wrong in all its forms was constitutional – he could not help it,” wrote Attorney Samuel C. Parks, a longtime friend of Abraham Lincoln.1 Contemporary Robert H. Browne recalled Abraham Lincoln telling him in 1854: “The slavery question often bothered me as far back as 1836-40. I was troubled and grieved over it; but the after the annexation of Texas I gave it up, believing as I now do, that God will settle it, and settle it right, and that he will, in some inscrutable way, restrict the spread of so great an evil; but for the present it is our duty to wait.”2

Browne came to know Mr. Lincoln as a teenage assistant in the Bloomington law office of David Davis and Asahel Gridley. “One evening as I sat and talked with him in the office, in order to answer his question as to what was the groundwork on my belief on slavery, I told him what I knew and has seen of it in the mild slaveholding city of St. Louis, and what my father knew about it for several years.” Browne recalled that he “talked an hour, with frequent questions interspersed by Mr. Lincoln, who was deeply interested in every fact and feature of this slavery business in the city of St. Louis, as we saw and understood it for so many years. When I had finished, he was in deep and profound study, and I thought perhaps he had fallen asleep. I said, in the usual way, not louder than ordinary conversation, ‘Mr. Lincoln, do you wonder that my father and myself were Abolitionists, or do you doubt our sincerity?’ This disclosed that he had not been asleep, but in deep thought. He sat firm, with not so much as a muscle of his face relaxed, as he had done through much of my recital. His face and its firm, drawn expression was like one in pain. He made a motion of some kind with his arm or head, and broke the strain, which, I remember, relieved me very much. He drew out a sighing ‘No. I saw it all myself when I was only a little older than you are now, and the horrid pictures are in my mind yet. I feel drawn toward you because you have seen and know the truth of such sorrow. No wonder that your father told Judge [Stephen A.] Douglas he had nothing but contempt for party platforms or technicalities that held and bound a free man in a free State, directly or remotely, to sustain a system of such unqualified cruelties and horrors….'”3

The Morality and Legality of Slavery

Lincoln often said that he had believed slavery was wrong for as long as he could remember. In a speech in Chicago on July 10, 1858 Lincoln said he of slavery: “I have always hated it, but I have always been quiet about it until this new era of the introduction of the Nebraska Bill began.”4 Lincoln scholar Harry V. Jaffa wrote: “For Lincoln…the entire antebellum debate came down to the question of whether the Negro was or was not a human being. If he was a human being, then he was included in the proposition that all men are created equal. If he was included in that proposition then it was a law of nature antecedent to the Constitution that he ought to be free and that civil society has as its originating purpose the security of his freedom and of the fruits of his labor under law.”5 Lincoln’s views on slavery, however, were at odds with the predominant racist feelings of Illinois residents. Early Lincoln chronicler Francis Fisher Browne noted: “During the years of Lincoln’s service in the Legislature of Illinois, the Democratic party was strongly dominant throughout the State. The feeling on the subject of slavery was decidedly in sympathy with the South. A large percentage of the settlers in the southern and middle portions of Illinois were from the States in which slave labor was sustained, and although the determination not to permit the institution to obtain a foothold in the new commonwealth was general, the people were opposed to any action which should affect its condition where it was already established. During the session of 1836-’37, resolutions of an extreme pro-slavery character were carried through the Legislature by the Democratic party. The aim of the measure was to prevent the Abolitionists from obtaining a foothold in the State.”6 Mr. Lincoln and a Whig colleague from Sangamon County introduced a petition in the legislature condemning slavery. Lincoln legal scholar Paul Finkelman wrote: “This early foray into the constitutional issues of slavery suggests that Lincoln, even as a young man, understood the constitutional limitations as well as the constitutional possibilities of fighting slavery.”7 He also understood the reality of his isolation on the slavery issue. Lincoln scholar Saul Sigelschiffer observed: “There were few sections of Illinois where prejudice against the Negro was stronger than in Sangamon County, which had been settled chiefly by Kentuckians.”8

5 0
3 years ago
40 POINTS! PLEASE HELP!!
laiz [17]

number one is c(thats what google said) and the second i think is the third one off of a movie i saw called the gangs of new york

5 0
3 years ago
What was the “Great Compromise” in drafting the new constitution? a plan to create new states in the Northwest a plan to create
velikii [3]
Base on the question that ask to choose among the following choices that states the Great Compromise in drafting the new constitution and base on my research and further investigation, the possible answer would be a plan to create a federal judiciary with state nominees. I hope you are satisfied with my answer 
3 0
3 years ago
What was the Inca Empire divided into?
IrinaK [193]
B is the correct answer.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what ways were the presidencies of Obama, Bush, and Clinton similar? What kinds of challenges were similar amongst the three
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

The presidencies of Obama, Bush, and Clinton, similar as they all are the capable leaders, and they all are the members of the Democratic Party.

All three were regarded as capable leaders. They were also all members of the Democratic Party. During their tenures, each of them worked on a Healthcare.

According to political facts, the three presidents grappled with concerns of the global order, particularly the waning of America's soft power.

Therefore, the presidents of the United States Obama, Bush, and Clinton similar in certain events.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Identifying the reforms and military action Peter III of Russia enacted, choose the groups he offended: (select all that
    12·2 answers
  • I need help on my history
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Woodrow Wilson create the Fourteen Points?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Southern states feel betrayed by President Zachary Taylor?
    5·2 answers
  • The goal of the historian is to create accounts of events
    13·1 answer
  • 9. How did Florida become a haven for escaped slaves?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of a dialogue?
    5·1 answer
  • How did kristallnacht demonstrate nazi persecution
    12·1 answer
  • Eastern United States
    10·2 answers
  • How many refugees suffered during this time?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!