(not <em>a</em> or not <em>b</em>) implies <em>c</em> <==> not (not <em>a</em> or not <em>b</em>) or <em>c</em>
so negating gives
not [(not <em>a</em> or not <em>b</em>) implies <em>c</em>] <==> not[ not (not <em>a</em> or not <em>b</em>) or <em>c</em>]
which we can simplify somewhat to
not (not (not <em>a</em> or not <em>b</em>)) and not <em>c</em>
(not <em>a</em> or not <em>b</em>) and not <em>c</em>
(not <em>a</em> and not <em>c</em>) or (not <em>b</em> and not <em>c</em>)
not (<em>a</em> or <em>c</em>) or not (<em>b</em> or <em>c</em>)
not ((<em>a</em> or <em>c</em>) and (<em>b</em> or <em>c</em>))
not ((<em>a</em> and <em>b</em>) or <em>c</em>)
Answer: 17
but before you put that was the '3' included?
Step-by-step explanation:
Its a Parellelogram, as the opposite sides are equal.
