Answer:
B (I'm not sure)
Explanation:
Express authority is the authority which the principal has expressly given to the agent whether orally or in writing.
At oral arguments at the Supreme Court, each side's attorney present their arguments publicly and undergo questions from the justices about their arguments. The oral arguments are then posted online for people to hear, often leading to analysis about what questions were asked or not asked.
Answer:
The correct answer is: a. Public compliance; private acceptance.
Explanation:
Public compliance can be understood as the social phenomena that occur when a group of people superficially agree on a particular thing, usually to get social approval.
<u>Private acceptance can be understood as a more personal change in attitude that individuals experience when they are fundamentally convinced of something they may have not seen before, but do not express it loudly and socially. </u>
In this particular case, when the participants of the standard experiments were able to write their responses on a piece of paper, conformity dropped dramatically. This means that during the experiments the level of public compliace were high while the levels of private acceptance were low.
In conclusion, the correct answer is a. Public compliance; private acceptance.
Answer:
norms
Explanation:
Social norms, or customs, are unwritten behavioral guidelines that are deemed acceptable in a community or culture. These social norms are vital for the stability and predictability of a society. People who follow these norms are well adjusted in group and those who don't follow the norms will be disapproved or even excluded from the group. As per the question, Thomas's decision to choose not to smoke in the class reveals his zeal to be accepted in class.
Answer:
Indirectly causing death
Explanation:
Euthanasia often referred to Mercy killing or doctor-aided-killing is the intentional act of ending a life in a painless manner usually administerd by the physician to a patient with an incurable sickness or disorder in a bid to ending persistent pain and suffering. McQuilkin and Paul Copan in their discussion on biblical ethics however noted that two extremes must be avoided which are trying to hasten death" and "Indirectly causing death"
