<span>Media networks often compete to be first. Insider information that results in the ability to present an article sooner than their competitors is a great incentive to cover topics of any niche. Accuracy is also key. If the insider information exposes accurate information, the media network is able to prepare their article without spending time checking facts.</span>
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
Answer:
Socratic Method
Explanation:
According to my research on different methods of critical thinking, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the professor is using the Socratic Method. This method focuses itself on a form of cooperative argument between two individuals, in which one asks and the other answers, and vice versa.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: I think It is Arrow C.
Explanation:
Answer:
what do you want help with?
by the way have a great day
