Answer:
Incomplete question
Complete question:
A society that puts equality—in the sense of equality of outcome—ahead of freedom will
end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests. On the other hand, a society that puts freedom first will, as a happy by-product, end up with both greater freedom and greater equality. A free society releases the energies and abilities of people to pursue their own objectives. It prevents some people from arbitrarily suppressing others. It does not prevent people from achieving positions of privilege, but so long as freedom is maintained, it prevents those positions of privilege from becoming institutionalized.
—Milton Friedman, Free to Choose (1980)
Which of the following governmental policies would the author most likely support?
a) Restricting individuals from carrying guns in public.
b) Allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational use.
c) Requiring individuals traveling in cars to wear seat belts.
d) Establishing minimun age requirements to access adult social media sites.
Answer: b) Allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational use
Explanation:
The author is most likely to support the Government in allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational purposes because he was very much emphatic about the freedom of individuals to do what makes them happy.
Answer:
In Renaissance times,writer were interested in individual experiences and in the world around them. .......The study of science changed during the Renaissance because the humanist spirit took hold and people started carefully started observing the world around them.
Explanation:
the answer is B surface zone
Answer:
This method was known as an interlocking directorate.
Explanation:
Interlocking directorate is the practice of the <em>same individual</em> being a <em>member </em>of multiple boards in companies.
In this case, J.P. Morgan has placed officers from his bank onto other companies' boards, thus carrying out the interlocking directorate method.
