Answer:
King Henry would most likely feel a bit of guilt for locking her in the tower to her death. While he was very determined to produce a male heir, he was still a Christian with Christian morals. As to his response, I'm not sure if a response is truly necessary since the letter was more of a "please don't forget me, and you are condemned to dam,nation for this" declaration. If he did respond it would probably be a senseless justification for her imprisonment and perhaps an apology.
Explanation:
Actually, these two novels could be said to express all of these themes and ideas. However, the authors of these two novels, F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway, are considered by many critics, scholars, and historians to belong to what is known as "the lost generation" of American writers. Hemingway and Fitzgerald, in fact, have been considered to be the "leaders," in a sense, of the "lost generation" of American writers, especially given their mutual expression of purpose for the post World War I generation in their novels.
In the 1800s, farmers have some complaints with regards to the farming business. One of these complaints came out to be the biggest one or the major one that happened in the late 1800s. It was their complaint on extremely high tariff on manufactured goods.
Pro Slavery- Their thoughts- we white folks are richer and better than these poor "blacks" we should be in control of them, they can help us take care of crops and be our slaves, it will make life easier.
Anti Slavery- it's unconstitutional, and wrong for people to treat people this way.
I am 100% against slavery i just wanted to put both sides of an argument.
god bless and have a good day <3
