Restricting another country’s access to resources and financing
Answer:
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
In research, the term plagiarism refers to the fact of taking someone else's ideas or concepts and use them as if they were one's own. In other words, when writing a paper, we use someone else's work and we don't quote the original authors and it seems as if the words were ours.
In this example, <u>the student quoted the original author of the paper and used one of his quotes in his work but he did give the author credit and he didn't make it seem as if the words were the student's own words. </u>Therefore, this doesn't classify as plagiarism.
Correct to eliminate split infinitive must be encouraged to at the very least consider some fresh possibilities.
<h3>What exactly does "split infinitive" mean?</h3>
Split infinitives are grammatical constructions in which the "to" and "infinitive" halves of what is more often referred to as the to-infinitive in modern linguistics are separated by an adverb or adverbial phrase. The word to and the simple form of a verb make up an infinitive (e.g. to go and to read). As a result of the adverbs "suddenly" and "quickly," the infinitives "to go" and "to read" are split (or broken apart), making them examples of split infinitives. One need not worry, though, as it is typically viewed as a writing mistake because another term can divide two portions and it appears disorganized. Unless one wishes to finish their work sooner than anticipated or has extra time on hand, revision is not necessary in this situation. However, one might spend some quality time reviewing these types of sections until every component fits together naturally without any forced words or paragraphs.
To know more about split infinitive, click here:
brainly.com/question/8990731
#SPJ4
