Sasha believes that the questions on school tests are so unrelated to course work that studying is useless. Sasha's belief most clearly illustrates an external locus of control.
External locus of control refers to the belief that whatever happens to us is the result of luck or fate.
In addition to this we believe that the action is not under our control or is useless or is determined by people in authority.
Sasha thinking clearly illustrates this.
To learn more about belief here
brainly.com/question/13877107
#SPJ4
Assuming you mean Charleston, SC, the state of Georgia lies southwest of Charleston.
Explanation:
Decisions regarding the product, price, promotion and distribution channels are decisions on the elements of the "marketing mix". It can be argued that product decisions are probably the most crucial as the product is the very epitome of marketing planning. Errors in product decisions are legion. These can include the imposition of a global standardised product where it is inapplicable, for example large horsepower tractors may be totally unsuitable for areas where small scale farming exists and where incomes are low; devolving decisions to affiliated countries which may let quality slip; and the attempt to sell products into a country without cognisance of cultural adaptation needs. The decision whether to sell globally standardised or adapted products is too simplistic for today's market place. Many product decisions lie between these two extremes. Cognisance has also to be taken of the stage in the international life cycle, the organisation's own product portfolio, its strengths and weaknesses and its global objectives. Unfortunately, most developing countries are in no position to compete on the world stage with many manufactured value-added products. Quality, or lack of it, is often the major letdown. As indicated earlier, most developing countries are likely to be exporting raw materials or basic and high value agricultural produce for some time to come.
Answer: High magnitude of consequences
Explanation:
The scam had a high magnitude of consequences as its effect had an impact on both the firm and individuals that worked in the firm.
Ohio, Texas, California, North Carolina, Georgia and New York!
