Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
<span>Percent error is the percentage ratio of the observed value and the true value difference over the true value so you don't need plus or minus signs. Thanks!</span>
Answer:
0.8213
Step-by-step explanation:
-This is a binomial probability problem given by the function:
Given that n=21 and p=0.2, the probability that she experience a delay on at least 3 days is calculated as:
Hence, the probability that she experience delay on at least 3 days is 0.8213
Answer:
T = 1yrs and 8month
Step-by-step explanation:
S.I = $97.3O
S.I = PTR/100
$<u>97.30</u> = <u>$1200 × 4.5 × T</u>
1 100
Cross multiply
$5400T = $9730
divide both sides by$5400
T = 1.8yrs
