The items that describes what happens at the equilibrium price are:
Producers supply the exact goods that consumers buy.
Consumers have enough goods, at the given price.
Producers used their resources efficiently.
Equilibrium pricing is when the items demanded match the items supplied. When this happens, the demand and good available equal each other, hence, equilibrium. The pricing is exactly where it should be for consumers to want and purchase the good or service.
Strategic alliances generally include the risk of one partner will make advantage of the other's information to strengthen its own competitive position.
A strategic alliance is an agreement between two businesses to work together on a project that will benefit both parties while maintaining their individual freedom. Compared to a joint venture, which sees two companies combine resources to form a new company, the arrangement is simpler and less legally enforceable.
The collaboration between Spotify and Uber is a well-known example of a strategic alliance. Due to their strategic partnership, Uber customers may log in to Spotify and listen to their favorite music while riding.
To learn more about Strategic alliance
brainly.com/question/14014533
#SPJ4
Answer: 97.99
Explanation:
The one-year forward rate that an investor would be indifferent between the U.S. and Japanese investments will be:
= Spot rate × (1 + Japanese rate / 1 + U.S rate)
= 101 × (1 + 1% / 1 + 4.1%)
= 101 × [(1 + 0.01) / (1 + 0.041)]
= 101 × (1.01/1.041)
= 101 × 0.9702209
= 97.99
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
The price one bicycle is $21
Explanation:
because 100÷10=0.1
and the total is 300$
300-100=20
20+0.1=20
answer is 21
