The measure of systematic risk is called <u>beta</u>.
The answer is option c.
Beta is the same old CAPM measure of systematic hazard. It gauges the tendency of the go back of protection to transport in parallel with the return of the inventory market as an entire. One manner to consider beta is as a gauge of a protection's volatility relative to the marketplace's volatility.
Systematic risk is a part of the total risk this is caused by factors beyond the control of a specific company or individual. Systematic risk is caused by elements that are outside to the organization. All investments or securities are situations to systematic hazard and, therefore, it's far a non-diversifiable chance.
To measure a monetary firm's contribution to systemic hazard includes measuring the company's expected capital shortfall in a crisis. This right away offers the regulator with a quantifiable degree of the relative significance of a firm's contribution to ordinary systemic chance.
Learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
a. 0.75% per month
b. 2.25% per quarter 
c. 4.5% semi- annually
d. 9% yearly
Explanation:
a. Computing the effective interest rate per payment period for the payment schedule which is monthly:
Effective rate (monthly) = Nominal rate (r) / Compounded monthly (m)
where
r is 9%
m is 12
Putting the values above:
= 9% / 12
= 0.75% per month
b. Computing the effective interest rate per payment period for the payment schedule which is quarterly:
Effective rate (quarterly) = Nominal rate (r) / Compounded quarterly (m)
where
r is 9%
m is 4
Putting the values above:
= 9% / 4
= 2.25% per quarter 
c. Computing the effective interest rate per payment period for the payment schedule which is semi- annually:
Effective rate (semi- annually) = Nominal rate (r) / Compounded quarterly (m)
where
r is 9%
m is 2 (every 6 months)
Putting the values above:
= 9% / 2
= 4.5% semi- annually
d. Computing the effective interest rate per payment period for the payment schedule which is annually:
 Effective rate (annually) = Nominal rate (r) / Compounded yearly (m)
where
r is 9%
m is 1 (end of the year)
Putting the values above:
= 9% / 1
= 9% yearly
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The answer is True
Explanation:
 The DC Kitchen which was started by Robert Egger was meant to address hunger by empowering minds and to meet the needs of those who were in poverty.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
German companies do not recognize the profit <u>until the project is completely finished and they have been paid.</u>
Explanation:
German companies prepare their accounting balances under IFRS standards (common for all EU member countries) and German GAAP. 
Under IFRS standards, revenue must be recognized when the business satisfies a performance obligation.
German GAAP is very prudent in determining profits, that is why they are only recognized once a project is completely finished and it has been completely paid. 
Some specific German rules are to starting to change due to globalization, but others are still subject to legal requirements. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
________________________________
 <em>In a cap-and-trade system, </em><em><u>the </u></em><em><u>government</u></em><em> set(s) a regulatory cap (limit) on emissions and issue(s) pollution permits, and </em><em><u>polluters</u></em><em> can buy, sell, and trade these permits with others.</em>
<em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em>
<em>I</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>a </em><em>cap </em><em>and </em><em>trade </em><em>system</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>government</em><em> </em><em>sets </em><em>an </em><em>emissions</em><em> </em><em>cap </em><em>and </em><em>issues </em><em>a </em><em>quantity</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>emission</em><em> </em><em>allowance</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>consistent</em><em> </em><em>with </em><em>that </em><em>cap</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Emitters</em><em> </em><em>must </em><em>hold </em><em>allowances</em><em> </em><em>for </em><em>every </em><em>ton </em><em>of </em><em>greenhouse</em><em> </em><em>gas </em><em>they </em><em>emit</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Companies</em><em> </em><em>may </em><em>b</em><em>uy </em><em>and </em><em>sell </em><em>allowances,</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>this </em><em>market </em><em>established</em><em> </em><em>an </em><em>emissions</em><em> </em><em>price</em><em>.</em>
<em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em><em>_</em>