81% of employed Irish-born women in the US worked as domestics.
Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
I think it was to cultivate tobacco
There were no child labors laws nor working unions the rights of employees were at the mercy of what was needed and unexistant.
The industrial revolution was a very contaminated and polluted dark snoky dirty ashy and sick period of history
Another hardship especially for coal miners was the same thing we have know implosion in short terms it is a combination of physical & emontional pollution that took over many lives
~ hope this helps
