What does Thomas Paine say in response to the argument that the British have protected the colonies

2 answers:

5 0

In response to the argument that the British have protected the colonies, Thomas Paine argues that while this is technically true, the British have only done so for their own economic gain--not out of a feeling of altruism.

slava [35]4 years ago

4 0

That they did not do it on the colonists account , but on their own account

You might be interested in

The United States backed out of financially helping Egypt build what thing?

natima [27]

Financially helped Egypt build a dam.

5 0

4 years ago

How many gold medals did mark spitz win in 1972?

nexus9112 [7]

In the 1972 Olympics, Mark Spitz won 7 gold medals for 100m Butterfly, 100m Freestyle, 200m Butterfly, 200m Freestyle, 4×100m Freestyle Relay, 4×100m Medley Relay, and 4×200m Freestyle Relay.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is one way local governments are similar to federal governments?

stiks02 [169]

Local governments are governmental jurisdictions below the level of the state, while the federal government is the national government.

Police departments, libraries, and schools usually fall under the oversight of state and local governments and each state has its own. However, one way local governments are similar to federal governments is that both of them are divided into three branches. The three branches are: executive, legislative and judicial.

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

External Factors in the fall of the Ottoman empire Assad

gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

The Ottoman economy was disrupted by inflation, caused by the influx of precious metals into Europe from the Americas and by an increasing imbalance of trade between East and West.

Explanation:

I hope it will help you....

#carryonlearning

4 0

3 years ago

In what ways could the failure the enforce conscription weaken rome?

xz_007 [3.2K]

"Their conscription were a failure due to not enforcing to everyone. As such there was not many people to choose from. It weaken Rome because armies need manpower to hold the front since equipment is useless if there is no person to use it. It also didn't enforce it on mostly on the useless people like the rich who don't contribute very much to society and the cooks and bakers who can't cook if all the farmers were conscripted which would mean no food. This weaken Rome more than it benefited her."

3 0

4 years ago