Answer:
The correct answer is A) they were evicted from the island, C) they were depicted as inferior and in need of help, and E) some of them were institutionalized.
Explanation:
The sentences that explain what happened to the people in Malaga Island, in Maine are: they were evicted from the island, they were depicted as inferior and in need of help, and some of them were institutionalized.
Malaga Island was a fishing village at the end of the 19th-century, beginning of the 20th-century. People used to live there without being married. People from Maine did not like the way those people lived. They asked them to leave the island. People form Malaga Island were perceived as fools, with feeble genes. Rumors said they even practiced barbaric conducts such as incest. That is why the sentences that explain what happened to the people in Malaga Island, in Maine are: they were evicted from the island, they were depicted as inferior and in need of help, and some of them were institutionalized.
The character I would want to analyze from the given book is Elisando.
<h3>What happened in the book?</h3>
This refers to the situation where a fisherman, Pelayo finds an old, frail man on the water bank after a storm and the man has wings.
Hence, we can see that they think he is an angel because of his wings and he also 'heals' their sick child. However, Elisando and Pelayo treat the old man shabbily and put him in a chicken coop.
People come from far and near to see this 'angel' and Elisando charges the people to see the old man he is still in the chicken coop, and the crowd throws him stones sometimes.
Nevertheless, one day, he regains his strength and leaves them. We can see that Elisando and her husband are awful in their treatment of their guest, even to the extent of charging admission fees and letting people brand the old man with a hot, searing iron.
Read more about A very Old Man with Enormous Wings. here:
brainly.com/question/14169605
#SPJ1
Answer:
A). Scientific studies show little or no difference in the health of herds treated with rbST and untreated herds.
Explanation:
A logical argument is described as an argument that proposes sufficient evidence to support its claim and acts as a guide to create new statements and drive the argument to reach a constructive conclusion.
In the given question, option A illustrate a logical argument as it offers a proposition 'little or no difference in the health of herds treated with rbST and untreated herds' with the evidential support ('scientific studies') to substantiate its claim and invokes further argument(to attain a conclusion). It functions to lead the argument/discussion that would drive the discussion forward in order to reach a conclusion or judgment about rbST. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
The narrator wants to show that he is not insane, and offers a story as proof. In that story, the initial situation is the narrator's decision to kill the old man so that the man's eye will stop looking at the narrator.
Answer: British Library Cotton MS Vitellius A XV
Explanation:
They survived working of medieval literature.
