Well first we need to change the format of the equations to slope-intercept, or y=mx+b.
So the first one (x + y < 1) will be changed to y < -x + 1.
The second one (2y ≥ x - 4) will be changed to y <span>≥ x/2 - 2.
Now we can analyze each graph.
In every single graph the first equation (y < -x + 1) is graphed correctly.
Now for the second equation, we can see that only the first and last graph correctly format to the equation.
Now for the shading:
The first equation shows us that y is less than -x +1, making the shading go under the dotted line. (to the left)
The second equation shows us that y is greater than or equal to x/2 - 2, making the shading go above the line. (also to the left)
Therefore, when we shade, the overlapping shading is correctly formatted in the first graph.
Hope this helped, comment any questions you have for me.</span>
Answer:
that would be -2200 sorry if im wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
(x+2)(2x-5)=54
We have:

Using the quadratic formula, this is approximately 5.66, so rounded to the nearest whole number, our answer is 6.
Answer:
2x bigger
Step-by-step explanation:
because if you split the rectange in half, it would be 2x?
Answer:
4x+8
Step-by-step explanation: