Answer:
This phrase imposes the connotation that the government approves the creation of large wild animals in captivity.
Explanation:
Lines 10-12 expose the fact that the government allows and supervises institutions that raise wild animals in captivity, to be used in commercials, films, among other things. This refers to a connotation that the government legally allows this type of animal to be raised in captivity, which reinforces the idea that the author had given in the previous paragraph that a private property can legally raise wild and exotic animals , as long as it does not promote their discomfort.
Almost all of living things??
Is that correct?
Sorry if doesnt make sense :(
Answer:
All three cases went to the Supreme Court for ruling.
Explanation:
The cases that went to the supreme corut ruling will be more likely to be considered as a landmark decision, which is the type of decisions that influence the live of the people on national scale.
I'll describe the effect of each decisions on national scale:
-Plessy v. Ferguson,
This decision resulted in the application of segregation law. Black people all across the nation were required to use different public facilities than the white citizens because of this.
- Brown v. Board of Education,
This decision diminish the effect of plessy v. Ferguson since it make the segregation of schools become illegal.
- Regents of California v. Bakke
This affect the people nationally because it allow race to become a factor for college admission . (It become the basis of affirmative action that help minorities get into universities)
People arent “born bad”. Its their life experiences that make them who they are for example: Criminals arent born criminals, its something that they experienced in life that made them do it. When a person mostly experiences bad things they tend to do negative things in life. But if you are surrounded by good people then youll become a positive person
