Answer:
The answer is explained below.
Explanation:
Scientific method is the one that studies phenomena through some steps that have been tested before; it also follows the same procedures every time (as long as it is possible; even the environment should be put in the same conditions) and, if done with enough attention and good care, it can lead to reliable results.
Due to these characteristics (reliability and procedures) it is a good way to study phenomena; since it is necessary to be aware of every little detail, it can help us understand things in general and in a deeper way.
People who study communication may find this method very helpful; I also think that computer science could be a good field to be studied with the scientific method.
<span>Cassidy wants to educate his angry mother about the individual privacy as basic human right even when it's a close relationship. By this Cassidy can be classified as social systems morality thinker. With an increase in the sense of individualism in the people these days personal privacy has become vital and this may vary from person to person.</span>
I asked my civics teacher the same question and her answer was that he hated Jews 'because he hated the people that practiced different religions and did not see him as a God.Most of the people who didnt follow that,were Jews'.
Answer:
Confucianism impacted Ancient Chinese in numerous ways and for a very large part of Ancient Chinese history. Confucianism brought a stability into a country which had been effected in many ways from previous changeovers in dynasties. Confucius made another impact on society by creating a school
The correct answer is C. The hypothesis of the study.
Explanation:
In research, informed consent implies the researcher needs to inform potential participants about different aspects of the research and their participation, in this way they can decide whether or not to participate. This includes explaining potential participants about possible harms or benefits, procedures they will be involved in, among others. However, the researcher is not forced to inform them about the hypothesis of the study as this might influence participants' answers or performance and thus make the research invalid.
