Answer: This concept can be used to determine the acceptable level of risk, by placing the amount of risk in a given situation to balance against time, trouble, cost, and physical difficulty of taking precautions to avoid risk. If a balance is seen with risk against this variables, then the risk is acceptable.
The pitfall to applying this concept are as follows;
• it doesn't guarantee safety.
• it is always expensive, if we want to apply this principle to it best.
• it doesn't have a standard order for all kinds of risk. The application varies from risk to risk, also depending on locations of the risk.
Explanation: The ALARP principle is that risk shall be reduced as far as reasonably practicable. This means that zero risk can not be achieved. But we can achieve zero accident, using the ALARP principle.
Before we can boast for achieving ALARP, we must check if the risk is equal or less than time spent,cost, the trouble or challenge, and the physical difficulty of taking a good measure to avoid the risk. If the risk is equal or less than this variables, that means that the risk has been reduced as far as reasonably practicable.
Answer: Forcing or dominating
Explanation:
Forcing is the act of oppression which particular task or work is performed by the management to achieve intended task.Domination is the manner in which control and authority is taken over particular matter. This form of power does not consider hearings and requirement of other people.
According to the question, forcing or domination is the method that can be used by manager to order certain command that should be followed by employees in case of conflict. This authority is provided to manager to handle any critical situation that has gone out of control.
We need more information. What are we conducting research on? What are we observing? What exactly am I supposed to be writing about? Give me more information and I'll try to help you the best I can.
