Answer:
1496
Step-by-step explanation:
A = lw
22 x 16 = 352 ( bedroom)
22 x 18 = 396 (living)
352 + 396 = 748
748 x 2 = 1496
hope this helps
pls mark brainliest
Answer:
Tiffany's nectar is more sugary
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Ramon:


Tiffany


Required
The nectar with more sugar
To do this, we simply calculate the fraction of sugar in both nectar.
This is calculated as:

For Ramon:


For Tiffany


From the calculations above:

Hence: Tiffany's nectar is more sugary
Answer:
1. 5x +43
2. -1.5x - 7
3. 6.2 - 2x
Step-by-step explanation:
<u />
<u>Equation 1:</u>
5 (x+8) +3
First, we can distribute the 5 to the (x+8) and get 5x + 40. Distributing is when we multiply the 5 by the first number (x) and then by the second number (8) Because they aren't like terms (don't both have x's) we cannot combine then and must keep them separated by a subtraction sign
Now we have: 5x + 40 + 3
Next, we can combine the like terms. This means that any that have the same variable can be combined. So, the 5x has no other x's so he has to stay how he is. The 40 and the 3, however, can be added together to get 43.
Our finished equation is: 5x + 43
<u />
<u>Equation 2:</u>
3.6x - 7 - 5.1x
First, we can combine like terms as we learned in the last problem. This would be our x's since we have multiple.
We can add 3.6x and -5.1x and get -1.5x
Now we have: -1.5x - 7
<u />
<u>Equation 3:</u>
4 + 8x + 2.2 - 10x
We can start with either the numbers with x's or without but I'll just do the x's. So we have 8x and -10x. Adding these together would get us -2x.
Next, we can combine 4 and 2.2 and get 6.2.
Now, putting these back into our equation would look like this:
6.2 - 2x
I'm not sure how much my explanations helped, but I hope you understand!!
Triangle angles add to 180 degrees. Thus, x - 17, x - 22, and 3x + 19 add to 180.
Add like terms to get 5x - 20 = 180
5x = 200
x = 40
Answer: A) Justification 1
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
The student did not match the angles correctly.
∠ABC = 90° and ∠BCD = 60° so they cannot state that the angles are congruent. The other statement on that line is wrong also, but is irrelevant since there is already an error in that line.