Answer:
War and losing allies
Explanation:
Although taking over more land may be better, these countries being taken over or turned democratic may result in that country waging war. also other allies of the acting party may also leave because those allies don't want anything to do with other countries purely trying to protect themselves. a good example of this is us Americans. *he he.
So if you go around the world and talk about america around business owners and politicians, they'll be likely to shun you for it, because we are likely to police the world in any way we can trying to eliminate communism. This results in few allies and many enemies. Hope this helps.
 
        
             
        
        
        
A. Have illusions and hallucinations
        
                    
             
        
        
        
After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.
When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation
        
             
        
        
        
They were allowed to vote but had to pay an amount too high for them to ever obtain so its like they still couldnt vote.
        
             
        
        
        
<span>Allow people that couldn't pay taxes or read to vote if his father or grandfather could vote.
</span>