Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data, then conclusions are drawn from the data. ... Even if all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false.
Answer:
testimonial one;
“King Pacal has asked that I design a temple for him, I’m honored. I’ll be working with others to make this temple as glorious as it can be. King Pascal is a descendant of the gods, an amazing one at that. He’s the reason Palenque is as it is, he helped us rise to our glory!” - a Mayan who helped design the Temple of the Inscriptions at Palenque
testimonial two;
“Palenque is beautiful. I helped build the temple here!. I didn’t work on it for long, but I worked on it as hard as I could. I think it’s pretty cool that I got to help build something to honor the great king Pacal. He’s amazing!” - a Mayan child who helped finish building the Temple of the Inscriptions at Palenque
Explanation:
I did an assignment with this question/task around a month ago and i used these for the testimonials
Could you list the follow words in the problem so I can assist you further?