Intentionally writing a check on an account with insufficient funds should not be done. True Fals

1 answer:

6 0

False.

The above statement is false because for intentionally writing a check on an account with sufficient funds, it is only considered illegal when it is intended for check kiting, it is written above $100 and has been done more than once.

If it has been done for the 1st time with the intent of depositing an amount to cover the issued check, then it would not be illegal.

You might be interested in

Find the area of the following shape. You must show all work to receive credit.

almond37 [142]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps!

Brainliest pls

Have a great day!

4 0

2 years ago

Mr. Dion is the band director at school. He asks students

Agata [3.3K]

I think B I’m
Not
Sue tho so don’t take my word on it but I think it’s B

8 0

2 years ago

Answer to question first

andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

C. But be careful. It depends if you have been told what I was having trouble with.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is a little unclear. If the actual interest is constant for all situations, the answer is C. The more times you compound, the more interest you will accumulate. Banks don't do it that way. It they compound every three months, then they cut the interest rate by a quarter.

So the interest would look like (1 + 0.022/4)*principle. Whoever made the question has to make clear what is going on. My guess is the intended answer is C.

5 0

2 years ago

Sketch the algebra-tile shape at right on your paper. Write an expression for the

Dima020 [189]

Answer:

Part 1) $P=(4x+4)\ units$