The economic issue that could be a cause of conflict in Southwest Asia are subsidies (government giving money to industries or businesses to keep prices low) especially in the areas of oil and natural gas.
Subsidy issues lead to conflict because they were initially meant to protect those that needed assistance but in reality seemed to benefit the rich and powerful. Once subsidies were in place they were difficult to remove because they were seen to be a “right”. Once they were taken out of place, Middle Eastern citizens were upset due to unreasonably high prices. This led to many subsidies being put back into effect.
The issue of subsidies often leads to conflict due to political regime changes causing shifts in opinions.
Pluralist theory in political science view that there are different no governmental groups that compete with each other to influence policy-making. Therefore there is no single elite or well-educated groups who exert pressure on decision making but democratic power is dispersed among different pressure groups.
Yes and no in a way the Constitution kinda ensured there rights as people. But did not directly state it that what when the bill of rights came to play. And if the continues the confederal government we would have an anarchy because the government would collapsed decades ago. Yes some might have could have took it over and not people might not have there rights.
